Friday, July 17, 2009

Part 2: 24mm

24mm

f/4, 1/200, ISO 200

f/5.6, 1/125, ISO 200

f/10, 1/40, ISO 200

f/16, 1/13, ISO 200


16-85

f/4, 1/200, ISO 200

f/5.6, 1/200, ISO 200

f/10, 1/40, ISO 200

f/16, 1/13 ISO 200

At 24mm, I really cant see much difference from the center. I can say the 18-55 always exposes the images abit more than the 16-85. Infact at center, "rubbermaid" comes out easier to read on the cheap lens. Again, corners..... not much to say, the 16-85 produces consistent ass-kicking. Infact corner sharpess is comparable on the 16-85 f/4 to the 18-55 at f/10. Chroma at f/4 on the 18-55 also is still very visible.. This time, i did take off both UV filters... but again i forgot to turn off VR.. in any case, it shouldnt have made much of a difference. Next up, at 35mm ill compare them both to the Nikkor 1.8 G DX prime aswell.

No comments: